Skip to content

Claims, the global file

Every claim we have checked.

One file for every speaker: hand-checked dossier entries and fact checks drafted by the watch desk agents and approved by an editor. Only claims that have been checked are listed; every one opens onto the evidence behind its rating.

Last discovery run: 15 Oct 2026, 13:26 IST, via rss+tavily, 27 official series retrieved

How a claim is checked

Narrow the file

Each filter is its own address. Copy the URL and you copy the view.

2 filters applied. Clear all filters

All claims

2 in view

Misleading

2 claims

Part of it is true, but the way it was said gives a wrong picture.

  • MisleadingSaurav Daschecked 30 Sept 2026

    “pointing to reports of approximately 13 crore voters being deleted in the past 18 months through SIR”

    approximately 13 crore voters

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    approximately 13 crore voters

    Saurav Das said approximately 13 crore voters were deleted in the past 18 months through the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

    news9live.com, checked 30 Sept 2026

    What is actually true

    The Election Commission's final figures for Bihar's Special Intensive Revision, published on 30 September 2025, show 65 lakh electors removed from the draft list, with the final roll containing about 7.42 crore electors, down from 7.89 crore before the exercise. In July 2026 the Commission said the SIR is carried out in phases, with draft rolls followed by claims, objections and appeals before deletions are finalised, and that names are restored where grievances are found valid. The Supreme Court's 27 May 2026 judgment held that deletions under the SIR were not contrary to Rule 21A of the 1960 Rules.

    • Media reports that cite Election Commission data describe the 13.3 crore figure as names missing from draft electoral rolls across 30 states and union territories, not as final deletions of voters. [2][7]
    • In Bihar's completed SIR, official final figures show 65 lakh electors were removed from the draft list, and the final roll had about 7.42 crore electors, compared with 7.89 crore before the exercise. [8]
    • The Election Commission's process includes a claims and objections period after the draft roll, appeals, and restoration of names where grievances are found valid; one report says 38 lakh appeals were pending, including 22.21 lakh filed by deleted voters seeking restoration. [10][1]
    • The official PIB note and Supreme Court documents in the record do not provide a national total of 13 crore final voter deletions. [10][11]

    [1] 14 times in 10 months, two Election Commissioners objected on record to poll panel steps — indianexpress.com[2] Voter List Deletions: Election Commission Data Shows 13.3 ... — deccanherald.com[7] SIR draft rolls see over 13 crore deletions so far, Delhi ... — indianexpress.com[8] Press Release Page | Press Information Bureau — pib.gov.in[10] Press Release Page | Press Information Bureau — pib.gov.in[11] 2026 INSC 564 Page 1 of 124 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA — eci.gov.in

    The 13 crore number is drawn from draft-roll exclusions during an ongoing revision, not from a final count of voters who have lost their place on the rolls. The Election Commission's own published process shows that draft exclusions can be reversed through claims, objections and appeals before the final roll is published. Using the draft-roll figure as if it were a final deletion count therefore overstates what the record shows.

    How this was checked: Checked against official records
  • MisleadingSaurav Das28 Sept 2026

    “The Supreme Court ENSURED that the SIR happened in Bengal in whatever manner barely months before the election. When the consequences of mass voters deletions became impossible to ignore, Justice Joymalya Bagchi in that bench made an extraordinary observation that those unable to vote “this time” could vote “next time”,”

    The claim's first part is substantially supported: the Supreme Court ordered or entrusted the SIR-related process and the exercise began in West Bengal in late February 2026, shortly before April polling. However, the attributed quotation to Justice Bagchi about voting 'next time' is not found in the official 13 April orders or the contemporaneous media report, which instead record different remarks. Pairing the true fact with an unsupported quotation gives a misleading impression of what the court actually said.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    Saurav Das said the Supreme Court ensured the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls took place in West Bengal barely months before the election, and that Justice Joymalya Bagchi remarked that voters unable to vote 'this time' could vote 'next time' once the consequences of mass voter deletions became impossible to ignore.

    awazthevoice.in, 28 Sept 2026

    What is actually true

    The Supreme Court's 13 April 2026 order notes that the SIR exercise commenced in West Bengal in the last week of February 2026 'in compliance of the orders passed by this Court', and polling was set for 23 and 29 April 2026. The same order records the Bench's appreciation for the task and states that if an appeal is allowed, directions for inclusion or exclusion would be effectuated before polling. Frontline's account of the 13 April hearing quotes Justice Bagchi as saying the Election Commission had 'deviated' from its Bihar position, not as telling excluded voters to vote next time.

    • The SIR exercise in West Bengal commenced in the last week of February 2026 in compliance with Supreme Court orders, a few weeks before polling on 23 and 29 April 2026. [4][6]
    • The Supreme Court's 13 April 2026 order records appreciation for the task and says allowed appeals for inclusion or exclusion would be effectuated before polling; it contains no observation that those unable to vote 'this time' could vote 'next time'. [4][6]
    • Frontline's report of Justice Bagchi's remarks on 13 April says he stated the Election Commission had 'deviated' from its position in the Bihar SIR litigation, not that excluded voters could vote next time. [1]

    [1] SIR West Bengal Voter Exclusion Case 2026 - Frontline — frontline.thehindu.com[4] In Re: Safety And Security Of Judicial ... vs Respondent(S) on 13 April, 2026 — indiankanoon.org[6] Mostari Banu vs The Election Commission Of India on 13 April, 2026 — indiankanoon.org

    The claim's first part is substantially supported: the Supreme Court ordered or entrusted the SIR-related process and the exercise began in West Bengal in late February 2026, shortly before April polling. However, the attributed quotation to Justice Bagchi about voting 'next time' is not found in the official 13 April orders or the contemporaneous media report, which instead record different remarks. Pairing the true fact with an unsupported quotation gives a misleading impression of what the court actually said.

    How this was checked: Checked against official records