Union government
Jeep scandal
A parliamentary committee reported in 1951 but its report was never made public; the government closed the matter in 1955 without action, and Menon joined the Union Cabinet in 1956.
The record
Year by year from 1947. Each entry tells you in plain words what happened, who did it, what the evidence is, and where the matter stands today. Every line links to a document: a court judgment, a law, an audit report or a charge sheet. The label on each entry is its position today. An accusation is not a conviction, and a person cleared by a court is shown as cleared.
189 documented, 71 being documented
Timeline
Scroll sideways along the timeline
1947–1964, 6 cases
Union government
A parliamentary committee reported in 1951 but its report was never made public; the government closed the matter in 1955 without action, and Menon joined the Union Cabinet in 1956.
Union government
Mudgal resigned during the debate on Nehru's expulsion motion in September 1951.
Union government
About ₹1.26 crore of LIC funds in Mundhra-group shares (estimates vary)
Finance Minister T.T. Krishnamachari resigned in February 1958, as did the Finance Secretary and LIC chairman; Mundhra was convicted of fraud.
Union government
₹20.25 crore government-backed loan (Lok Sabha, 1962)
Charge-sheeted by the CBI in 1967 and brought back from London in 1971, Teja was convicted; the company was merged into the Shipping Corporation of India.
Union government
Malaviya resigned after the Das report raised prima facie concerns; no prosecution followed.
Punjab
The Das Commission upheld some of the charges in June 1964, and Kairon resigned that month.
1966–1977, 4 cases
Union government
Maruti Ltd was liquidated in 1977 and the Justice A.C. Gupta Commission issued a strongly critical report; no conviction followed.
Union government
₹60 lakh withdrawn from SBI, mostly recovered
Nagarwala was convicted and died in custody in 1972; the 1978 Reddy Commission said the Prime Minister's office had obstructed the police inquiry.
Union government
Mishra was killed in January 1975; no final verdict against Ram appears in the record reviewed.
Bihar
The prosecution was withdrawn in 1981 after his own cabinet approved it; the Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal in 1982 and, by 3:2, in 1986.
1980–1984, 4 cases
Union government
About US$9.85 million notional loss (Committee on Public Undertakings, 1983)
Parliament's Committee on Public Undertakings found the purchase 'not prudent' but made no finding of wrongdoing; no prosecution followed.
Maharashtra
Antulay resigned in January 1982; he was cleared after a 12-year legal battle ending in the Supreme Court.
Madhya Pradesh
A one-judge commission and the High Court cleared Arjun Singh.
Union government
US$100,000 (alleged)
A Delhi court acquitted all three in December 2003, calling Pathak's evidence unreliable.
1984–1989, 3 cases
Union government
₹64 crore in alleged kickbacks on a ₹1,437 crore howitzer contract
The Delhi High Court found no evidence against Rajiv Gandhi in 2004; Quattrocchi was discharged in 2011 and never extradited; the Supreme Court dismissed the last appeal in August 2026.
Union government
Alleged 7% commission on a ₹465 crore contract
A 1990 CBI FIR named a former Defence Secretary and company representatives; the probes ended without any conviction.
Union government
Rao and Tewari were let go for lack of evidence in 1997; Chandraswami was acquitted in 2004, though the court held the documents were forged.
1991–1996, 9 cases
Kerala
About ₹2.3 crore alleged loss (CAG)
Proceedings against Karunakaran ended with his death in 2010; the trial of the others remains held up by petitions in the Supreme Court.
Union government
About ₹4,000 crore (widely cited estimate)
Mehta's conviction was upheld in 2003 and bank officials were sentenced as late as 2018; no minister was charged.
Karnataka
A special court acquitted them in 2003; the High Court dismissed the CBI's appeal in 2011.
Union government
A special court convicted both in 2000; the Delhi High Court acquitted them in 2002. The MPs' parliamentary immunity was overruled by the Supreme Court in 2024.
Union government
₹650 crore alleged loss (claim by former minister Kalpnath Rai)
Kalpnath Rai resigned; no prosecution established responsibility.
Union government
The Supreme Court cancelled 15 allotments and imposed ₹50 lakh in damages in 1996, then set aside the damages and the CBI direction on review in 1999.
Union government
She died in 2015 without a verdict; her former aide was sentenced to two years in 2016.
Union government
Over ₹1.16 crore in cash recovered from the minister's home (CBI)
Convicted in several cases; the Delhi High Court upheld a sentence in 2011, and he got five years in the Haryana Telecom case.
Union government
₹133 crore paid for urea never delivered (CBI)
A special CBI court convicted eight people in 2018, including the PM's relative B. Sanjeeva Rao.
2004–2009, 8 cases
Haryana
₹1,500 crore alleged loss to landowners (CBI, 2018)
The Supreme Court cancelled the land transfers in 2018; Hooda's trial continues.
Andhra Pradesh
Eleven CBI chargesheets have been filed since 2011; the trial is pending and nothing has been proven.
Union government
Natwar Singh resigned in December 2005; the Pathak inquiry found allocations were made to oblige an associate but no evidence that he received money.
Haryana
A special CBI court discharged Hooda and AJL in April 2026.
Union government
₹578 crore alleged wrongful gain to Devas (CBI, 2016)
The deal was cancelled in 2011; in 2022 the Supreme Court called it a 'product of fraud' by Devas. The criminal cases are pending.
Union government
The CBI found no evidence of kickbacks, and the Delhi High Court declined to order a further probe in 2016.
Union government
₹1.76 lakh crore presumptive loss (CAG, 2010)
The Supreme Court cancelled all 122 licences in 2012; a special CBI court acquitted all accused in 2017. The CBI's appeal is pending in the Delhi High Court.
Union government
₹1 crore in cash displayed in the Lok Sabha
A parliamentary committee found no evidence against either; in 2013 a court discharged most accused, and the money trail was never traced.
2009–2014, 11 cases
Union government
Over ₹90 crore alleged loss on the timing-scoring contract (CBI, 2011)
A court accepted the ED's money-laundering closure report in April 2025 after a related CBI case closed; Kalmadi was never convicted and died in January 2026.
Maharashtra
Chavan resigned as Chief Minister in 2010; in 2017 the Bombay High Court set aside the sanction to prosecute him.
Union government
₹1.86 lakh crore estimated windfall to private allottees (CAG, 2012)
The Supreme Court cancelled 214 allocations in 2014. Former coal secretary H.C. Gupta and others have been convicted in several cases (under appeal); other cases ended in acquittal.
Union government
₹1,63,557 crore potential earnings to the operator over 60 years (CAG — not a computed loss)
These remain audit findings; no prosecution followed.
Goa
₹35,000 crore (Justice M.B. Shah Commission estimate)
A court discharged Kamat in one case in 2025; another chargesheet against him remains.
Maharashtra
About ₹70,000 crore spent for a ~0.1% rise in irrigation (spending, not a loss estimate)
The state ACB told the High Court in 2019 that Pawar was not involved; probes into other tenders continued.
Union government
AJL properties worth over ₹2,000 crore allegedly acquired for ₹50 lakh (ED allegation)
A trial court declined to take cognisance of the ED chargesheet in December 2025; the ED's challenge is listed in the Delhi High Court for 12 October 2026.
Union government
₹14 crore alleged bribe offer (per the Army chief)
The CBI closed the procurement probe in 2014; the trial in the bribe-offer case is under way.
Haryana
Bought for ₹7.5 crore in 2008, sold to DLF for ₹58 crore (ED allegation)
A Delhi court took cognisance of the ED's money-laundering chargesheet in April 2026 and granted Vadra bail; no court has found guilt.
Union government
€556 million contract; the ED alleges a middleman received about €30 million
India cancelled the contract in 2014; Italy's top court acquitted the company executives in 2019; middleman Christian Michel was extradited in 2018 and no Indian verdict has been delivered.
Union government
₹90 lakh allegedly paid for a Railway Board post (CBI)
Bansal resigned and is a prosecution witness, not an accused; the trial of ten accused continues.
Amounts are the estimating body's own figure (CAG, CBI, a commission or a court): an estimate or allegation, not a proven loss. Each outcome is stated as of October 2026. Cases that involved several parties, such as the Jain hawala diaries, are left out.
1948
In 1947, India enacted a law allowing the Central Government to give effect to measures called for by the United Nations Security Council under Article 41 of the UN Charter. The Constitution of India, 1950, contained Article 370, a temporary provision giving Jammu and Kashmir special status and limiting Parliament's power to make laws for the State. In 2019, Article 370 was rendered inoperative by a Presidential order, so the separate Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir stood inoperative and a single constitution applied to all Indian states.
Kashmir reference to the UN Security Council
1948
In 1947, India enacted a law allowing the Central Government to give effect to measures called for by the United Nations Security Council under Article 41 of the UN Charter. The Constitution of India, 1950, contained Article 370, a temporary provision giving Jammu and Kashmir special status and limiting Parliament's power to make laws for the State. In 2019, Article 370 was rendered inoperative by a Presidential order, so the separate Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir stood inoperative and a single constitution applied to all Indian states.
The proceedings were dropped, stayed or closed. No court ever decided guilt or innocence — read below for how that happened.
What happened
In 1947, India enacted a law allowing the Central Government to give effect to measures called for by the United Nations Security Council under Article 41 of the UN Charter. The Constitution of India, 1950, contained Article 370, a temporary provision giving Jammu and Kashmir special status and limiting Parliament's power to make laws for the State. In 2019, Article 370 was rendered inoperative by a Presidential order, so the separate Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir stood inoperative and a single constitution applied to all Indian states.
Who did it
Kashmir reference to the UN Security Council
The evidence
Where it stands today
The retrieved documents do not show any pending proceeding. Article 370 was rendered inoperative in 2019 by the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019.
What was done
The Government of India enacted the United Nations (Security Council) Act, 1947, which allowed the Central Government to make provisions to apply Security Council measures under Article 41 of the UN Charter. The Constitution of India, 1950, included Article 370 as a temporary provision for Jammu and Kashmir; in 2019, the article was rendered inoperative by the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019.
What it meant for the country
The retrieved documents record that Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir special status and was later rendered inoperative, but they do not establish the consequences for people, money or rights beyond that legal change.
Step by step
The documents
Compiled from the documents cited, 12 Oct 2026
1948
Benefit to the nationIn India, many low-paid workers had no legal floor on what they could be paid for listed jobs. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 created a nationwide scheme under which the appropriate government — the central government for railways, mines, oil-fields, major ports and central corporations, and state governments otherwise — had to fix minimum pay for scheduled employments, review the rates at least every five years, and require cash payment, overtime pay and days of rest. Courts applied the law to railway track construction and maintenance and allowed workers to recover unpaid minimum pay under this Act as well as the Payment of Wages Act. Amendments in 1954, 1957 and 1961 treated earlier wage fixes as lawful, and the Act and its validating amendments stand as law on the record.
Workers' rights
1948
Benefit to the nationIn India, many low-paid workers had no legal floor on what they could be paid for listed jobs. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 created a nationwide scheme under which the appropriate government — the central government for railways, mines, oil-fields, major ports and central corporations, and state governments otherwise — had to fix minimum pay for scheduled employments, review the rates at least every five years, and require cash payment, overtime pay and days of rest. Courts applied the law to railway track construction and maintenance and allowed workers to recover unpaid minimum pay under this Act as well as the Payment of Wages Act. Amendments in 1954, 1957 and 1961 treated earlier wage fixes as lawful, and the Act and its validating amendments stand as law on the record.
This is something a government or Parliament decided, or a rule a court laid down. It is not a criminal case against anyone.
What happened
In India, many low-paid workers had no legal floor on what they could be paid for listed jobs. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 created a nationwide scheme under which the appropriate government — the central government for railways, mines, oil-fields, major ports and central corporations, and state governments otherwise — had to fix minimum pay for scheduled employments, review the rates at least every five years, and require cash payment, overtime pay and days of rest. Courts applied the law to railway track construction and maintenance and allowed workers to recover unpaid minimum pay under this Act as well as the Payment of Wages Act. Amendments in 1954, 1957 and 1961 treated earlier wage fixes as lawful, and the Act and its validating amendments stand as law on the record.
Who did it
Workers' rights
The evidence
Where it stands today
No challenge to the validity of the Act is recorded in the sources. The statute remains in force as cited; the wage-recovery disputes in the sources were decided on the points described, and no appeal or later stage is shown in the provided documents.
What was done
The legislature enacted the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, imposing a duty on the appropriate government to fix and revise minimum wages for scheduled employments. The central and state governments were required to issue Gazette notifications fixing rates after inquiry or consultation, and the legislature passed amendments in 1954, 1957 and 1961 validating certain earlier wage fixations.
What it meant for the country
The documents record a legally enforceable minimum-wage and overtime floor for scheduled employments, with court rulings that preserved workers' ability to recover unpaid wages; no adverse outcome is documented.
Step by step
The documents
Compiled from the documents cited, 1 Oct 2026
1948
Benefit to the nationThe Reserve Bank of India, the country's central bank, was originally a shareholders' bank. In 1948 a law was passed to bring its capital into public ownership. On 1 January 1949 all shares were transferred to the Central Government, and shareholders were to be paid ₹118 and 10 annas per share in government promissory notes. The law stands and the Reserve Bank is publicly owned.
Reserve Bank of India and its shareholders
1948
Benefit to the nationThe Reserve Bank of India, the country's central bank, was originally a shareholders' bank. In 1948 a law was passed to bring its capital into public ownership. On 1 January 1949 all shares were transferred to the Central Government, and shareholders were to be paid ₹118 and 10 annas per share in government promissory notes. The law stands and the Reserve Bank is publicly owned.
This is something a government or Parliament decided, or a rule a court laid down. It is not a criminal case against anyone.
What happened
The Reserve Bank of India, the country's central bank, was originally a shareholders' bank. In 1948 a law was passed to bring its capital into public ownership. On 1 January 1949 all shares were transferred to the Central Government, and shareholders were to be paid ₹118 and 10 annas per share in government promissory notes. The law stands and the Reserve Bank is publicly owned.
Who did it
Reserve Bank of India and its shareholders
The evidence
Where it stands today
No proceedings are shown as pending. The transfer took effect on 1 January 1949 and the Act remains in force.
What was done
The Reserve Bank (Transfer to Public Ownership) Act, 1948 was enacted on 23 September 1948. The Central Government fixed 1 January 1949 as the appointed day. On that day the Act transferred all Reserve Bank shares to the Central Government, removed the existing directors, and set the compensation for shareholders.
What it meant for the country
The record shows a gain of public control: the Reserve Bank's entire share capital was transferred to the Central Government, while shareholders were provided compensation.
Step by step
The documents
Compiled from the documents cited, 1 Oct 2026
1949
Benefit to the nationBefore independence, British India had separate electorates: Muslims, Sikhs and other groups voted in separate pools and could elect only candidates from their own community. The Constituent Assembly first accepted joint electorates with reserved seats for minorities in August 1947, then on 11 May 1949 its Advisory Committee on Minorities recommended ending reservation for religious minorities and keeping it only for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Assembly adopted that position, and the Constitution that came into force on 26 January 1950 reserves seats in the House of the People and state assemblies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, not for religious communities. The provisions remain in force.
Abolition of separate electorates and communal representation
1949
Benefit to the nationBefore independence, British India had separate electorates: Muslims, Sikhs and other groups voted in separate pools and could elect only candidates from their own community. The Constituent Assembly first accepted joint electorates with reserved seats for minorities in August 1947, then on 11 May 1949 its Advisory Committee on Minorities recommended ending reservation for religious minorities and keeping it only for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Assembly adopted that position, and the Constitution that came into force on 26 January 1950 reserves seats in the House of the People and state assemblies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, not for religious communities. The provisions remain in force.
This is something a government or Parliament decided, or a rule a court laid down. It is not a criminal case against anyone.
What happened
Before independence, British India had separate electorates: Muslims, Sikhs and other groups voted in separate pools and could elect only candidates from their own community. The Constituent Assembly first accepted joint electorates with reserved seats for minorities in August 1947, then on 11 May 1949 its Advisory Committee on Minorities recommended ending reservation for religious minorities and keeping it only for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Assembly adopted that position, and the Constitution that came into force on 26 January 1950 reserves seats in the House of the People and state assemblies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, not for religious communities. The provisions remain in force.
Who did it
Abolition of separate electorates and communal representation
The evidence
Where it stands today
No proceedings are pending. The constitutional provisions on reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes remain in force.
What was done
The Constituent Assembly, on the recommendation of its Advisory Committee on Minorities, removed separate electorates and statutory reservation of seats for religious minorities, and retained reserved seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Constitution adopted on 26 November 1949 and in force from 26 January 1950 gives effect to this in Articles 330 and 332.
What it meant for the country
The change is recorded as beneficial: the Constitution removed separate electorates that had 'poisoned our political life for so many years' and created a cleavage among communities, while securing reserved seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
Step by step
The documents
Compiled from the documents cited, 1 Oct 2026