Skip to content

Claims, the global file

Every claim we have checked.

One file for every speaker: hand-checked dossier entries and fact checks drafted by the watch desk agents and approved by an editor. Only claims that have been checked are listed; every one opens onto the evidence behind its rating.

Last discovery run: 15 Oct 2026, 13:26 IST, via rss+tavily, 27 official series retrieved

How a claim is checked

Narrow the file

Each filter is its own address. Copy the URL and you copy the view.

1 filter applied. Clear all filters

All claims

11 in view

Not true

4 claims

What they said is not true. The official record shows something else.

  • Not trueRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    Six out of every 100 women in India are raped.

    Off by three orders of magnitude from the official crime rate.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    6 in 100 women (6%)

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NCRB Crime in India records rape on the order of about 4 per lakh women, not 6,000 per lakh.

    • NCRB Crime in India records rape as a counted offence. Recent all-India rates are on the order of about 4 recorded rapes per lakh women, not 6,000 per lakh.
    • Six in 100 women would be 6%. That is three orders of magnitude above the official recorded rate.
    • Under-reporting is real. NFHS and NCRB both say so in different ways. Under-reporting does not turn 4 per lakh into 6 per 100 as an official fact.

    NCRB, Crime in India

    Off by three orders of magnitude from the official crime rate.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • Not trueRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    45% drop out because of marriage or housework.

    One reason-code anecdote is stated as the dropout rate.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    45% drop out over marriage or housework

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    UDISE+ girls’ secondary dropout is far below 45% — about 8% in the latest published year, not 45%.

    • UDISE+ girls’ secondary dropout in the latest published year used in this file is about 8%, not 45%.
    • Marriage and housework appear among reasons in some education studies and household questions. A reason-code is not the dropout rate.
    • The Ministry of Education’s official dropout series is UDISE+. It does not print 45% of girls leaving because of marriage or housework.

    UDISE+Ministry of Education

    One reason-code anecdote is stated as the dropout rate.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • Not trueRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    99% of sexual violence, rape, and molestation cases go unreported.

    Under-reporting is real. 99% is not the official dark figure.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    99% of sexual violence unreported

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NCRB publishes reported cases. NFHS publishes some disclosure questions. Neither series is a 99% official unreported rate.

    • NCRB publishes recorded sexual offences. By definition those are the reported cases, not the unreported share.
    • NFHS publishes some questions on whether violence was told to anyone. Those disclosure items are not a 99% official dark figure for rape, molestation and sexual violence together.
    • Research on under-reporting exists. It does not become a 99% official rate.

    NCRB, Crime in IndiaNFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    Under-reporting is real. 99% is not the official dark figure.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • Not trueRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    Boys can take examinations multiple times after the age limit, but the marriage age is 23 for women.

    Two different systems are fused into one official rule that does not exist.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    Exam age limits for boys vs marriage age 23 for women

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    Legal marriage age is not 23. Exam age limits vary by paper and are not a marriage-age rule of 23.

    • The legal minimum age of marriage is not 23. Under current law it is 18 for women and 21 for men.
    • Exam age limits are set paper by paper in NTA, UPSC and SSC notifications. They are not a marriage-age rule, and they are not “boys may repeat after the limit, women must marry at 23”.
    • PIB and the statute book are the official sources for marriage age. Exam information bulletins are the official sources for attempt limits.

    National Testing AgencyPress Information Bureau

    Two different systems are fused into one official rule that does not exist.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked

Misleading

7 claims

Part of it is true, but the way it was said gives a wrong picture.

  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    Every year, around 4 lakh girls are killed before they are born.

    A real harm is given a round number that is not the current official count.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    4 lakh girls killed before birth every year

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    Sex-ratio-at-birth problems are documented. A current official annual total of 4 lakh is not what SRS or Census publish as that sentence.

    • Sex-ratio-at-birth problems are documented in SRS, Census and NFHS. That harm is real.
    • A current official annual total of “around 4 lakh girls killed before they are born” is not what SRS or Census publish as that sentence.
    • Missing-women estimates in research papers use models and older years. They are not this year’s official count in the form spoken on stage.

    Ministry of Statistics and Programme ImplementationNFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    A real harm is given a round number that is not the current official count.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    80% of women face harassment.

    A survey slice is inflated into an 80% universal rate.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    80% of women face harassment

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NFHS and NCRB publish specific violence and crime rates. 80% of all women facing harassment is not those tables.

    • NFHS-5 publishes specific violence and safety questions for defined groups of women, not “80% of women face harassment”.
    • NCRB Crime in India publishes recorded crimes against women. Recorded crime is not an 80% prevalence of harassment.
    • Some local or campus surveys have reported high harassment shares in their sample. A sample is not all women in India.

    NFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family WelfareNCRB, Crime in India

    A survey slice is inflated into an 80% universal rate.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    Approximately 30%, or 29%, of women face physical violence.

    The NFHS number is used without the ever-married / spousal frame.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    29–30% of women face physical violence

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NFHS-5 reports about 29% of ever-married women 18–49 experiencing spousal violence — not 29% of all women, all forms.

    • NFHS-5 reports that about 29% of ever-married women aged 18–49 have experienced spousal violence. That is the official cell.
    • The official universe is ever-married women 18–49, and the act is spousal violence — not “29–30% of women” and not all physical violence by anyone.
    • Using the NFHS number without the frame makes a real statistic misleading.

    NFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    The NFHS number is used without the ever-married / spousal frame.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    50% of women are forced to reject work or education due to safety concerns. The average Indian woman spends ₹17,000 extra every year on safety.

    Two precise numbers with no official table.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    50% drop work or education; ₹17,000 extra on safety

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    No official labour or education series says 50% of women reject work or school for safety, or ₹17,000 a year.

    • PLFS does not publish that 50% of women reject work because of safety.
    • UDISE+ and the Ministry of Education do not publish that 50% of women reject education because of safety.
    • No MOSPI or NFHS table in this file is an official ₹17,000 extra per year spent on safety by the average Indian woman.
    • Safety costs and restricted mobility appear in research and in some survey items. Those are not these two precise official numbers.

    MOSPI, Periodic Labour Force SurveyNFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family WelfareMinistry of Education

    Two precise numbers with no official table.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    60% of our girls cannot go outside the house alone.

    A restricted survey item is stated as a national 60%.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    60% of girls cannot go out alone

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NFHS publishes mobility questions for specific ages and places. 60% of “our girls” is not that table.

    • NFHS publishes mobility questions — for example whether a woman can go to the market, a health facility or outside the village alone — for defined ages and marital statuses.
    • “60% of our girls cannot go outside the house alone” is not that table. “Girls” and “outside the house” are not the NFHS wording or universe.
    • Some NFHS mobility items show large restrictions. They must be quoted with the question and the denominator.

    NFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    A restricted survey item is stated as a national 60%.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    Only 8% of women have independently owned property.

    A property share without the NFHS denominator.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    8% of women independently own property

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    NFHS land-and-house questions use a defined universe. 8% of all women is not the published ownership line.

    • NFHS asks who owns the house and land, and whether ownership is alone or jointly, for women in a defined sample.
    • “8% of women have independently owned property” is not the published NFHS ownership line for all women and all property.
    • Joint title, house-only, land-only and “alone” are different official cells. The sentence names none of them.

    NFHS-5, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    A property share without the NFHS denominator.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked
  • MisleadingRahul Gandhi22 Aug 2026Pune

    The average woman between the ages of 15 and 29 spends 5.5 hours doing work at home. In the same house, the average boy spends 30 minutes working.

    The direction is in the TUS. The two clock times are not the official cell.

    What the evidence shows

    What they said

    Women 15–29: 5.5 hours housework; boys: 30 minutes

    Pune rally · 22 August 2026, 22 Aug 2026

    What is actually true

    Time Use Survey 2019 shows a large unpaid-work gap. It does not publish this exact 5.5 hours vs 30 minutes for ages 15–29.

    • The Time Use Survey 2019 shows a large unpaid domestic and care-work gap between men and women in India. That direction is official.
    • TUS does not publish this exact pair — 5.5 hours for women 15–29 versus 30 minutes for “the average boy” in the same house — as a released cell.
    • Age cuts, “boy” versus man, and “the same house” are not how the published TUS tables are written.

    MOSPI, Time Use Survey

    The direction is in the TUS. The two clock times are not the official cell.

    How this was checked: Editorial — hand-checked