One file for every speaker: hand-checked dossier entries and fact checks drafted by the watch desk agents and approved by an editor. Only claims that have been checked are listed; every one opens onto the evidence behind its rating.
Last discovery run: 15 Oct 2026, 13:26 IST, via rss+tavily, 27 official series retrieved
What they said is not true. The official record shows something else.
Not trueAkhilesh Yadavchecked 1 Oct 2026
“Faced with issues like inflation, unemployment, a lack of investment, and the failure to double farmers' income, they are now harking back to the pre-2017 era”
3.2%
What the evidence showsHide the evidence↓↑
What they said
Akhilesh Yadav said the BJP government has failed on inflation, unemployment, investment and doubling farmers' income, and is now harking back to the pre-2017 era.
latestly.com, checked 1 Oct 2026
What is actually true
3.2%
unemployment rate, Economic Survey 2024-25
pib.gov.in
The Economic Survey 2024-25, presented by the Ministry of Finance, says the unemployment rate for people aged 15 and above fell from 6.0% in 2017-18 to 3.2% in 2023-24, and retail headline inflation softened to 4.9% in April-December 2024. A PIB release on the Survey says gross capital formation in agriculture grew 19.04% in 2022-23. On farmers' income, a Rajya Sabha answer of 5 December 2025 says average monthly income per agricultural household rose from ₹6,426 in 2012-13 to ₹10,218 in 2018-19; a Business Standard report on a NITI Aayog member's paper says income jumped 126% between 2014-15 and 2023-24.
The Economic Survey 2024-25 says the unemployment rate for people aged 15 and above fell from 6.0% in 2017-18 to 3.2% in 2023-24. [7]
The same Survey says retail headline inflation softened to 4.9% in April-December 2024, from 5.4% in FY24. [7]
A PIB release on the Economic Survey says gross capital formation in agriculture grew 19.04% in 2022-23, indicating increased investment. [3]
A Rajya Sabha answer of 5 December 2025 says average monthly income per agricultural household rose from ₹6,426 in 2012-13 to ₹10,218 in 2018-19. [2]
A Business Standard report on a NITI Aayog member's paper says farmers' income jumped 126% between 2014-15 and 2023-24, surpassing the doubling target. [1]
The claim asserts failure on inflation, unemployment, investment and doubling farmers' income. Official data contradict the first three: unemployment fell, inflation was moderate, and agricultural investment grew. The farmers' income part is not established as a failure by the official parliamentary answer, which only gives figures up to 2018-19, and a reported NITI Aayog member study says income more than doubled by 2023-24. The 'harking back' phrase is political framing, not a factual claim. Because the load-bearing assertions are contradicted by the official record, the verdict is false.
Not trueMallikarjun Kharge (Indian National Congress)29 Sept 2026
“History bears witness that ten years ago, this very Prime Minister devastated India’s economy with the decision of “demonetization.””
7.1 per cent
What the evidence showsHide the evidence↓↑
What they said
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said that ten years ago Prime Minister Narendra Modi devastated India's economy with the decision on demonetisation.
hindustantimes.com, 29 Sept 2026
What is actually true
7.1 per cent
real GDP growth average after demonetisation, Lok Sabha answer, Dec 2025
sansad.in
In a written answer in the Lok Sabha on 8 December 2025, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said national accounts data from the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation show real GDP growth averaged about 7.1 per cent in the immediate years after demonetisation, 2016-17 and 2017-18, and about 7.3 per cent between 2016-17 and 2024-25 excluding the pandemic-affected years. The Economic Survey 2016-17 Volume 2 said the real economy grew 7.1 per cent in 2016-17, down from 8 per cent the previous year, but called the economy relatively resilient to the liquidity shock.
A written Lok Sabha answer on 8 December 2025 said real GDP growth averaged about 7.1 per cent in 2016-17 and 2017-18, and about 7.3 per cent between 2016-17 and 2024-25 excluding pandemic-affected years, with India remaining one of the fastest-growing major economies after demonetisation. [7]
The Economic Survey 2016-17 Volume 2 noted the real economy grew 7.1 per cent in 2016-17 compared with 8 per cent the previous year, and said this suggested the economy was relatively resilient to the large liquidity shock of demonetisation. [8]
The Reserve Bank of India's annual report said the Indian economy demonstrated resilience in 2016-17, marked by moderate expansion, low inflation, and improvement in current account and fiscal deficits. [2]
The claim says demonetisation devastated the Indian economy. Official figures show the economy kept growing after demonetisation: real GDP growth averaged about 7.1 per cent in the next two years, and growth slowed from 8 per cent to 7.1 per cent in 2016-17. That is a slowdown, not devastation. The official record therefore contradicts the assertion that the economy was devastated.
Part of it is true, but the way it was said gives a wrong picture.
MisleadingRahul Gandhichecked 12 Oct 2026
“Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday (Jul 17) launched a sharp attack on the Centre over repeated examination paper leaks, alleging that India’s education system has reached a stage where leaked question papers are being sold at fixed prices and advanced technology is being misused to manipulate recruitment and entrance exams.”
₹40 lakh for NEET UG 2026, ₹15 lakh for IIT-JEE 2021, ₹1.02 crore
What the evidence showsHide the evidence↓↑
What they said
₹40 lakh for NEET UG 2026, ₹15 lakh for IIT-JEE 2021
Rahul Gandhi alleged that India’s education system has reached a stage where leaked question papers are being sold at fixed prices and advanced technology is being misused to manipulate recruitment and entrance exams.
wionews.com, checked 12 Oct 2026
What is actually true
₹1.02 crore
attached from main accused in UP paper-leak case, ED, June 2024
enforcementdirectorate.gov.in
The Enforcement Directorate, which investigates financial crimes, said in a June 2024 press release that its investigation found question papers for the UP Police Constable Recruitment Examination-2023 and the UPPSC RO/ARO Exam-2023 were leaked and provided to aspirants for money before the exam date, and it attached ₹1.02 crore belonging to the main accused [7]. The government itself told Parliament that paper leaks and malpractices have occurred across the country, and the Lok Sabha passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Bill, 2024 to curb them [8]. No official record in the retrieved sources states the fixed prices Gandhi listed or confirms that advanced technology is being misused.
The Enforcement Directorate's June 2024 press release says its investigation found question papers for the UP Police Constable Recruitment Examination-2023 and the UPPSC RO/ARO Exam-2023 were leaked and provided to aspirants for money before the exam date, and ₹1.02 crore belonging to the main accused was attached [7]. [7]
The government told the Lok Sabha that paper leaks and malpractices have occurred in various parts of the country, and Parliament passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Bill, 2024 to curb them [8]. [8]
The fixed prices Rahul Gandhi cited — ₹40 lakh for NEET UG 2026, ₹15 lakh for IIT-JEE 2021, ₹10 lakh for Bihar Teacher Recruitment 2024 — come from a chart he displayed, not from any official record [3]. [3]
A Times Now investigation found that papers being sold on Telegram as leaked NEET 2026 papers were fake and the channels demanding money were scams [6]. [6]
The general phenomenon Gandhi describes is real: the Enforcement Directorate's own investigation found leaked question papers were provided to aspirants for money in specific Uttar Pradesh exams, and the government has acknowledged leaks across the country. But the specific 'fixed prices' he listed and the claim that advanced technology is being misused are not confirmed by any official record — the prices come only from his own chart. One investigation into online paper sales found the papers being hawked were fake, which is context that changes how the fixed-price claim reads.